INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING IN EDUCATION

Download

Dr. Nur Aisyah Binti Farukh
Faculty of Education,
University of Malaya,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
E-mail: nuraisyah.zulkifli@um.edu.my
ORCID: 0000-0003-2245-6689

Keywords: student-centered learning, constructivism, direct instruction, learning theories, classroom practices, secondary education

Abstract. This article explores the implementation of student-centered learning approaches in Malaysian secondary education. By analyzing contemporary pedagogical practices and national education policies, the study identifies challenges and opportunities in shifting from traditional teacher-centered models to more participatory and inclusive forms of learning. The research is based on qualitative interviews with teachers and school leaders across five Malaysian states. Findings highlight the necessity for pedagogical innovation, teacher autonomy, and culturally responsive teaching practices to foster active learner engagement and critical thinking.

Introduction

Education systems globally are moving toward more learner-centered paradigms, and Malaysia is no exception. Over the last decade, educational reforms in Malaysia have emphasized holistic development, creativity, and problem-solving skills among students. Despite policy-level changes, the practical implementation of student-centered learning (SCL) remains uneven. This paper aims to investigate how SCL is interpreted, adapted, and applied within Malaysian secondary schools, focusing on both systemic and classroom-level dynamics.

Main part. Student-centered learning is grounded in constructivist theory, which views learning as an active, contextualized process wherein learners construct new knowledge based on their prior experiences and interactions with the world, rather than passively receiving information. This approach emphasizes learner agency, critical thinking, and the importance of meaningful engagement with content. A key influence on this perspective is Lev Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory, which highlights the role of social interaction and cultural tools in cognitive development. Vygotsky introduced the concept of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), suggesting that learners achieve deeper understanding and skill acquisition when supported through guided interaction with more knowledgeable others. This aligns with student-centered learning’s focus on scaffolding and collaborative learning environments.

Additionally, John Dewey’s experiential learning model reinforces the importance of learning through experience, reflection, and active participation. Dewey believed that education should be rooted in real-life contexts and should prepare individuals for democratic participation and problem-solving in society. His ideas support the implementation of student-centered learning that is responsive to learners’ needs, interests, and lived experiences. To further contextualize this pedagogical approach, the paper integrates principles of culturally relevant pedagogy, particularly as they apply to the Malaysian educational context. Culturally relevant pedagogy emphasizes the need for instructional methods that reflect and respect the diverse cultural backgrounds of students. In a multicultural society like Malaysia, where ethnic, linguistic, and religious diversity shapes educational experiences, culturally relevant practices are essential for ensuring that student-centered learning is equitable, inclusive, and responsive to learners’ identities and communities. By combining constructivist principles with socio-cultural and experiential learning theories — and grounding these in culturally responsive practices — this study aims to explore how student-centered learning can be meaningfully applied in Malaysian classrooms to support both academic achievement and holistic development.

          This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 25 secondary school teachers and 5 school administrators from diverse regions in Malaysia including Selangor, Johor, Sabah, Sarawak, and Penang. Data were analyzed thematically using software to identify recurring patterns related to teaching strategies, student participation, curriculum flexibility, and institutional support.

          1. Teacher Perceptions and Adaptation

          Most participants expressed support for the philosophy of SCL but noted a lack of resources and training. Teachers often adapted strategies like group discussions, project-based learning, and flipped classrooms to fit their own teaching styles and students’ needs.

          2. Institutional Barriers

          Rigid curricula, standardized testing, and limited classroom time were frequently cited as obstacles to full SCL implementation. School leadership played a critical role in enabling or restricting innovation in pedagogy.

          3. Cultural Influences

          In some contexts, the traditional reverence for teacher authority challenged the adoption of participatory learning methods. However, teachers who embraced cultural sensitivity reported better student responsiveness and engagement. The Malaysian educational context requires a balanced integration of student-centered approaches that respect local cultural values. While SCL promises to cultivate independent and critical thinkers, it must be contextualized within the sociocultural and institutional realities of Malaysian schools. Professional development, curriculum reform, and leadership support are crucial for sustainable change.

References

1. Abdullah, M. Y., & Mahmud, Z. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions and challenges in implementing student-centered learning in Malaysian classrooms. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.2
2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press.
3. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
4. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.